Media
-
Rodriguez-The First Christian Letters
The First Christian Letters
Reading 1 and 2 Thessalonians
(Cascade, 2024>
Paul's letters to the Thessalonians are the earliest surviving Christian documents. They are also among the most easily overlooked parts of the New Testament. What could these short, simple letters possibly have to say to a world caught in the throes of racial discord, political polarization, fears of an uncertain future, and fights over truth and false news? While Paul and his companions could not have imagined anything like the twenty-first century, their letters in the mid-first century to non-Jewish followers of Jesus in northern Greece address problems we still wrestle with today: race and ethnicity, family, ethics, an unknown future, how to respond to strangers, and more. These letters, rather than being an outdated part of Paul's collected letters, provoke us to throw ourselves into the great challenges of the modern world, to resist the temptation to repay "another person evil for evil," and to "pursue the good, both for one another and for everyone" (1 Thess 5:15). Will we read these ancient letters anew?
-
The Media Matrix of Early Jewish and Christian Narrative
The Media Matrix of Early Jewish and Christian Narrative
by Nicholas A. Elder
(T&T Clark, 2019)
Generically, theologically, and concerning content, Mark and Joseph and Aseneth are quite different. The former is a product of the nascent Jesus movement and influenced by the Greco-Roman Bioi (“Lives”). It details the life, ministry, death, and resurrection of a wandering Galilean. The latter is a Hellenistic Jewish narrative influenced by Greek romances and Jewish novellas. It expands the laconic account of Joseph's marriage to Aseneth in Genesis 41 into a full-fledged love and adventure story. Despite these differences, Elder finds remarkable similarities that the texts share. Elder uses both texts to examine media and modes of composition in antiquity, arguing that they were both composed via dictation from their antecedent oral traditions. Elder's volume offers a fresh approach to the composition of both Joseph and Aseneth and Mark as well as to many of their respective interpretive debates.
Read the review in RBL 06/2021 by Mark D. Cooper. Cooper concludes:
Elder’s research serves as a much-needed rejoinder to thoseof uswho have put too muchemphasis on the importance of orality. For this reason, Elder’s monograph should be a staple toanyone working within the field of performance criticism (or anyone opposed to performancecriticism),Joseph and Aseneth, or textual matters related to the Gospel of Mark.